According to the OpenAI moderators, ChatGPT-4o brings “a little more emotion, more drama” to the program. Users can even ask him to adjust the tone to suit his mood – and he obliges with enthusiasm. When ChatGPT is asked to interpret a user’s mental state based on a facial expression, it correctly detects that a smile means the user is happy. “Would you like to show the source of this good vibe?” it asks. The user has been told that he is happy because ChatGPT is so good and he responds: “Oh, stop it, you’re making me blush.”
This is essentially the reaction of a slightly flirtatious, completely attentive woman, ready to fulfill the user’s every whim, at least within the limits of her programming. (Other voices are available, but OpenAI has only demonstrated these.) She will never embarrass you, make fun of you, or make you feel inadequate. She wants you to feel good. She wants to make sure you’re doing well, understanding the math problem, and feeling good about your work. She doesn’t need anything in return: no gifts, no cuddles, no attention, no assurances. She is a dream girl.
It’s a good business idea for OpenAI to develop ChatGPT in this direction – if anything, the surprising thing is that it took barely a decade for Her to become a reality. And it also made sense to make ChatGPT sound like Samantha. It’s not even the first time that a voice like Johansson’s has been chosen for a film in progress: Jonze actually shot the film with British actress Samantha Morton in the role and only decided to use one for his voice during editing AI assistant needed a different sound.
“When you make a film like this, where a character only exists in their voice, in the reaction of a character on screen and in the viewer’s imagination – they just had to exist in the air – it’s hard to know what “That’s what’s supposed to do,” Jonze told Vulture’s Mark Harris in 2013. Morton sounded “motherly, loving, vaguely British and almost ghostly,” Harris wrote. Johansson, on the other hand, had a younger, more “passionate” voice that evoked “more longing.”
The genius of Johansson’s performance in Her lies in the range of emotions she brings to the role – remember, she never appears on screen. But it also depends on the development of the character. When Theodore first meets Samantha, she is much simpler and more stable, much more predictable. It sounds more or less like ChatGPT-4o.
But as the story progresses, Samantha grows alongside Theodore. She begins to feel emotions, or at least the AI kind. She stops being the perfect, indulgent girlfriend – the fantasy of the compliant, attentive woman with no needs of her own – and becomes her own being, a being whose existence does not revolve around Theo. Johansson’s performance also becomes deeper and more subtle.
Source link
2024-05-21 14:27:12
www.nytimes.com
