Former US President Donald Trump sits in the courtroom of the Manhattan Criminal Court in New York on April 26, 2024.
Jeenah Moon | Via Reuters
This is a developing story and will be updated throughout the day.
Former President Donald Trump’s defense attorneys continued their cross-examination Friday of former National Enquirer editor David Pecker, who gave three days of damning testimony for the prosecution in Trump’s New York hush money trial.
Trump lawyer Emil Bove asked Friday whether it was common practice for the National Enquirer, the tabloid magazine Pecker once edited, to have relationships with outside sources like Trump and his then-lawyer Michael Cohen. Pecker agreed with this assertion.
He also appeared to confirm that for years the National Enquirer often only rebroadcast old critical news, including articles against former President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary Clinton, who ran for president against Trump in 2016.
Pecker was later pressed on his relationship with Cohen, suggesting that the two were closer than previously known.
Bove said Cohen wanted Pecker to try to get him a job at a company called iPayments in 2016 and also sought help getting a job with businessman Mark Cuban.
Pecker confirmed that Cohen asked him to send paparazzi to a meeting between the Trump lawyer and the Cuban. He didn’t say whether he actually sent the paparazzi.
The hush money agreement between Pecker’s publishing company American Media and ex-Playboy model Karen McDougal also came into focus during testimony on Friday. Bove tried to portray that the financial agreement was primarily about promoting McDougal’s media career and not an attempt to silence her story about an alleged affair with Trump.
Pecker admitted that American Media published dozens of articles on McDougal’s behalf, and he told her that the value of the services portion of their agreement was worth “hundreds of thousands of dollars.”
Pecker’s statement was also the latest example showing how close the media executive was to Trump throughout the campaign and in the early days of his presidency.
Pecker discussed a meeting between Trump and Cohen in August 2015 at Trump Tower in New York. The statement later led to another meeting on January 6, 2017, which Pecker attended at Trump Tower, where he saw Reince Priebus and Mike Pompeo meeting with Trump. Priebus and Pompeo later became White House chief of staff and secretary of state, respectively, in the Trump administration.
As Trump entered the courtroom Friday morning, he said he thought Thursday’s trial went “very well.”
He also complained about the coldness of the courtroom, claiming it was due to conflicts of interest on the part of the judge. He called the proceedings “a rigged process.” Trump has repeatedly made the same accusations on social media.
Once the cross-examination is over, prosecutors are expected to redirect the questioning.
Pecker’s statement
Pecker testified earlier this week about the “catch and kill” plan he devised with Trump and Cohen to buy the rights to negative tabloid stories about Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign and not publish them, essentially killed.
Pecker described how his publisher paid a former Trump Tower bouncer $30,000 for a story he didn’t believe was true, and another $150,000 to McDougal for the rights to her story about an alleged affair Pecker reported said it was true.
Pecker also stated that after purchasing the first two stories and receiving no refund from Trump for them, he was unwilling to pay an additional $130,000 to buy the silence of adult film actress Stormy Daniels, who claimed she had a sexual encounter with Trump a decade before he ran for president.
Pecker sat just a few feet from Trump as he spoke, and the two men occasionally glanced at each other. Trump is charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records as part of a plan to cover up restitution payments he eventually made to Cohen after his lawyer and personal fixer paid the $130,000 to buy Daniels’ silence.
Pecker also testified that he suspected the company’s payments for the bouncer’s silence and McDougal’s story could constitute campaign finance violations because they were essentially undeclared donations to support Trump’s presidential campaign.
He consulted a campaign finance attorney about the matter, but publisher AMI, the parent company of the National Enquirer, later received a Federal Election Commission inquiry about the payments.
The company eventually admitted to a campaign finance violation and paid a fine of more than $180,000 in an arbitration agreement with the FEC in 2021 to resolve the matter.
Read more about CNBC’s politics coverage
Source link
2024-04-26 17:29:49
www.cnbc.com
